What the tension in the oil market means

As we await the US jobs data, it bears remembering that oil is a big wildcard both on in terms of consumption and investment. Right now, oil is plunging, down as much as $14 a barrel for the Brent variant and $17 a barrel for WTI since mid-April. The question is whether the rout continues.

I think it does and here’s why.

Go back to March, when I wrote the last flurry of oil-related posts. That was when we saw the first post-OPEC agreement downdraft. Oil prices recovered in April but to a slightly lower level, before cliff diving again.

oil-prices May 2017

Source: Business Insider

So there’s a tension here. Saudi Arabia is supposed to be the world’s swing producer and they have finally acceded to output cuts to stabilize oil prices, getting Russia onboard too. But, at today’s prices, a lot of North American shale production is viable and these guys are swamping the market, with rig counts up every week.

Rig count 2017-05 

Now, if you look at the North American rig count numbers in a multi-year context things, we are nowhere near the highs of 2014.

Rig count 2017-05 longer

But back in March, I was calling the rig count a bubble. And the longest term view makes clear why.

Rig count 2017-05 longest

So, while one could legitimately call the increase in rig count and the switch of oil majors to shale oil investment an echo bubble, the size of the uptick is nowhere near what we saw before. And given where oil prices are coming from – $50 a barrel, there is no support for the kind of capex we saw when oil traded above $100 a barrel.

Why this matters. Oil prices are not going up dramatically. Shale oil has become the swing producer, and these shale projects are viable at these levels, ensuring a supply glut which will keep prices under pressure. But the downdraft in capex from any collapse in prices is likely to be more muted and have less impact on the economy. At the same time, with global growth re-accelerating, the fall in prices could be a windfall for consumers, especially in developed economies where workers’ real earnings is still recovering.

On net, I believe the scenario is negative for global growth, if marginally so. The risk is in credit, particularly regarding knock-on effects for emerging markets, commodity credits and high yield more generally.

The Fed is only likely to pause if we get a panic situation that drags oil back down to $30 a barrel. But, while the Fed is on course for three or four rate hikes this year because of a tightening bias, oil in the $40 range will get the Fed’s attention because of the capex and consumption implications. 

Bottom line: oil prices will continue to be under pressure as long as rig counts are rising. We will see a yo-yoing of prices, but the calls for $60 or $70 a barrel look misplaced. Analysts still expect WTI to average $55 for the whole of 2017; these forecasts will be under pressure. Yield curve flattening and pressure on emerging market and high yield credits are the biggest risks.

About 

Edward Harrison is the founder of Credit Writedowns and a former career diplomat, investment banker and technology executive with over twenty five years of business experience. He has also been a regular economic and financial commentator on BBC World News, CNBC Television, Business News Network, CBC, Fox Television and RT Television. He speaks six languages and reads another five, skills he uses to provide a more global perspective. Edward holds an MBA in Finance from Columbia University and a BA in Economics from Dartmouth College.

Comments are closed.