Why The Mid-East Turmoil Is A Big Drag On Economic Growth

The upshot of all this is that oil prices will probably remain high and could very well rise significantly even from current levels. For the U.S., studies indicate that every $1 rise in the price of a barrel of oil is about equivalent to a 2.5 cent increase in a gallon of gas. Oil prices have already jumped about $10 a barrel since the start of the crisis and $22 since November, translating into an eventual 55 cent a gallon rise in the price of gas. Since every 1 cent rise in a gallon of gas costs consumers about $1.2 billion the increase to date will cause a $66 billion rise in spending for gas alone alone without even including the gas components in the price of such items as airline tickets, express mail and anything that is transported by truck. This is virtually the same as an increase in taxes since it means less money available for spending on discretionary goods. When we consider the possibility of even further increases in oil prices and then add in the prospective rise in food prices, it is easy to see the highly negative effect on economic growth in the period ahead.

By Comstock Partners

The Mid-East turmoil is not over, and, most likely, has only begun. The revolt in Tunisia spread to Egypt, and now Libya, a nation that produces 2% of the world’s oil. There have also been demonstrations in other Arab nations such as Bahrain, Yemen, Algeria and Iran. Others may be next. History tells us that revolutions of this type are contagious once the first nation shows what could be done. This was true hundreds of years before the age of the internet and cell phones, and is therefore even truer today.

We also know that revolutions seldom end in benign fashion and that violence and chaos are more the norm. This is particularly valid in the Mid-East where revolts have never ended with the formation of stable democracies. It is therefore likely that turmoil in this section of the world will continue for some time with unpredictable results.

Related Posts
1 of 1,554
Subscribe to our newsletter

As a result of this unpredictability and the extremely small chance of a quick and benign outcome, oil prices have already soared and will remain high and volatile for an extended period of time. Libya produces 2% of the word’s oil, an amount that could probably be replaced by Saudi Arabia within a reasonable period. What is particularly worrisome is that demonstrations in largely Shia Bahrain could spill over into neighboring Saudi Arabia, whose provinces bordering Bahrain produce most of its oil. This area also contains most of the minority Shia in a mostly Sunni country. In addition Bahrain’s rulers are Sunnis as well. Therefore it is easy to see that the potential for trouble is not insignificant.

The upshot of all this is that oil prices will probably remain high and could very well rise significantly even from current levels. For the U.S., studies indicate that every $1 rise in the price of a barrel of oil is about equivalent to a 2.5 cent increase in a gallon of gas. Oil prices have already jumped about $10 a barrel since the start of the crisis and $22 since November, translating into an eventual 55 cent a gallon rise in the price of gas. Since every 1 cent rise in a gallon of gas costs consumers about $1.2 billion the increase to date will cause a $66 billion rise in spending for gas alone alone without even including the gas components in the price of such items as airline tickets, express mail and anything that is transported by truck. This is virtually the same as an increase in taxes since it means less money available for spending on discretionary goods. When we consider the possibility of even further increases in oil prices and then add in the prospective rise in food prices, it is easy to see the highly negative effect on economic growth in the period ahead.

This all in addition to high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, high rates of mortgage foreclosures, elevated inventories of unsold homes and tight credit conditions. Furthermore, don’t overlook the impact that higher oil and other commodity costs will have on overly optimistic earnings forecasts that will have to be revised down.

Ordinarily, in order to combat such a headwind to growth the Fed would ease monetary policy and the Administration and Congress would provide fiscal stimulation. At this time, however, this policy is not feasible as the interest rates under Fed control are already near zero and Congress is pressing to reduce the deficit. When we also consider that QE2 ends in June, we think that current economic growth forecasts are subject to important downward revisions in the months ahead.

At the same time, the market is up 100% in two years for the first time since the depression era in the 1930s, and is overbought, overextended and overvalued. It is therefore likely that the Mid-East turmoil is the catalyst that finally ends this secular bear rally and starts the market on a downward course.

Advertisements
Advertisements

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

2 Comments
  1. Lilguy says

    I’m still not buying the “peak oil” argument, one that has been out there since at least the oil crises of the 1970s. The fact is that oil can be extracted from just about anything (like shale) if the price is right, and there are still unplumbed depths in the oceans where oil may exist.

    “Peak oil” is a fraud perpetrated by those who seek to profit by driving oil prices higher.

    1. Edward Harrison says

      It’s not a fraud at all. It is a fact. The lower-48 US oil supply peaked in 1970 – that is a fact and it has made the US vulnerable to the supply of foreign oil for the first time in history. That’s why the argument exists at all. The question is when will global oil supply peak and what price level is necessary to extract the harder to extract oil available. It’s not about running out of oil.

      There are various forms of the argument. But the fact is that there is a finite supply of oil. That is fact. As demand increases and supplies are used, a day will come when oil prices must be much higher to spur investment to extract more difficult oil pockets. When will that day come? Many say it has already arrived. I agree. That’s why you have Deepwater oil exploration.

      The result will be higher prices followed by demand destruction from recession and increased investment in oil extraction technology. And this will be a recurring theme until alternate energy forms are found.

  2. Lilguy says

    I’m still not buying the “peak oil” argument, one that has been out there since at least the oil crises of the 1970s. The fact is that oil can be extracted from just about anything (like shale) if the price is right, and there are still unplumbed depths in the oceans where oil may exist.

    “Peak oil” is a fraud perpetrated by those who seek to profit by driving oil prices higher.

    1. Edward Harrison says

      It’s not a fraud at all. It is a fact. The lower-48 US oil supply peaked in 1970 – that is a fact and it has made the US vulnerable to the supply of foreign oil for the first time in history. That’s why the argument exists at all. The question is when will global oil supply peak and what price level is necessary to extract the harder to extract oil available. It’s not about running out of oil.

      There are various forms of the argument. But the fact is that there is a finite supply of oil. That is fact. As demand increases and supplies are used, a day will come when oil prices must be much higher to spur investment to extract more difficult oil pockets. When will that day come? Many say it has already arrived. I agree. That’s why you have Deepwater oil exploration.

      The result will be higher prices followed by demand destruction from recession and increased investment in oil extraction technology. And this will be a recurring theme until alternate energy forms are found.

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. AcceptRead More