Muni Bond Crisis: What Kind of Numbers Are We Talking?

Here is a good segment on CNBC that takes another look at the muni issue which Chris Christie and Meredith Whitney raised on 60 Minutes on Sunday.  Benjamin Thompson of Samson Capital says he can’t get the numbers Meredith Whitney used on 60 minutes – 50 to 100 issuer defaults on hundreds of billions of dollars in principal – to work unless we see defaults in several major municipalities.

I haven’t read Whitney’s 600 page muni report but my understanding is that Whitney’s muni research has been more geared to states and that this might be the reason for the large numbers she cites. Also, I have yet to see Whitney say that she expects these defaults to all happen in 2011. Every clip I have seen gives an indeterminate period over which this fallout is expected to occur.


My takeaway from the state and local government financial situation is that there will be defaults. The question is when and in what measure. If we see recovery through to the end 2011 and beyond, there isn’t likely to be a crisis in municipal bonds. And that means long/short relative value plays will open up for dedicated muni investors. But, for the retail investor, the complicated issues in municipal finance represent the potential for serious losses when a spate of defaults does begin in the next downturn.

Below is Meredith Whitney’s riposte to Benjamin Thompson in an interview with Maria Bartiromo, where she defends her muni crisis prediction.

15 Comments
  1. Edward Harrison says

    Two good videos in this one from a pro-muni adherent and from Meredith Whitney making her case that the municipal problem is for real.

  2. DavidLazarusUK says

    I have to side with Meredith Whitney on this. She was right about the banks. She has spent more than a year working on this. I agree that there will be defaults. She is right that the incoming congress will be reluctant to support another bailout. That will create more problems.

    The US unemployment rate will probably stay above 10% for years and obviously it will stay as low as that because many unemployed will exhaust their entitlements.

    If the government wanted to stimulate the economy bailing out the banks would have been much better than extending Bush’s tax cut.

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More